Chartclimb

← Research another idea

How hard is “cycle tracker”?

Unverified

Real, Apple-confirmed search demand (High). Apple fills the top ten for almost every search, so a full board says nothing yet — we haven't checked how many of these apps are genuinely about it. Until we have, this is neither open nor contested.

Search Ads: High

Median ratings, top 10
94K
Also charting
6 / 10
Distinct apps seen
11 over 24 crawls
Genuinely on-topic
—

Ratings across the top 10: p25 30.1K · median 94K · p75 173.9K · max 2M

The current top 10 for this term, by position in Apple’s public search response.
#AppRatingsChart rank
1Flo Cycle & Period TrackerHealth & Fitness2M#2
2Stardust Period TrackerHealth & Fitness117.8K#25
3Clue Period & Cycle TrackerHealth & Fitness404.5K#32
4My Cycle ؜Health & Fitness97.5K—
5Period Tracker Period CalendarHealth & Fitness173.9K#41
6Melda Cycle & Period TrackerHealth & Fitness400—
7Cycles: Period & Cycle TrackerHealth & Fitness27.1K—
8Natural Cycles: Fertility AppHealth & Fitness30.1K#28
9Ovia Cycle & Pregnancy TrackerMedical90.5K#79
10Period Tracker by GP AppsHealth & Fitness77.8K—

15 more apps in this board

The top 10 are above. The rest of the board, and how each one moved, are one click away.

10 tracked apps in the top 10 as of 2026-09-29, out of about 180 results.

Subscribers needed for a target MRR

Type in prices you’ve actually seen on a competitor’s paywall — this repo has no way to scrape subscription tiers, only the App Store’s public data. Monthly and annual plans are normalised so they can be compared honestly.

5% is a commonly-cited starting point for a consumer subscription app — not measured against this niche. Edit it.

Positions come from Apple’s public Search API — the top 25 are stable enough to read as a ranking, and an app missing from this table is outside the first ~190 results rather than absent from search. Ratings and chart ranks are the same numbers Apple shows anyone. Nothing here is a prediction.